+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: PFF wk 1 (/Thread-PFF-wk-1)
RE: PFF wk 1 - bfine32 - 09-14-2020
Do they grade punters/
RE: PFF wk 1 - pally - 09-14-2020
The Bengals kept RBs in to block on 10 occasions on 45 dropbacks against the Chargers.
— Jake (@Jake_NFL) September 14, 2020
They kept TEs in to block on 5 occasions, and John Ross once.
PFF puts 6 pressures on Bobby Hart and 2 on Burrow's own creation. I noted that he may have run into pressure once or twice.
RE: PFF wk 1 - rfaulk34 - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 04:41 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Do they grade punters/
So...overall, Huber got a 60.6, but his punting grade was 75.2. So i'm guessing he got deducted for kicking the ball into the end zone so many times.
RE: PFF wk 1 - Au165 - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 04:43 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: So...overall, Huber got a 60.6, but his punting grade was 75.2. So i'm guessing he got deducted for kicking the ball into the end zone so many times.
Which isn't on him at all, twice they landed in the 5 and bounced in because the gunners couldn't contain it.
RE: PFF wk 1 - bfine32 - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 04:43 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: So...overall, Huber got a 60.6, but his punting grade was 75.2. So i'm guessing he got deducted for kicking the ball into the end zone so many times.
Loses points for being the holder on the Randy crampKick?
RE: PFF wk 1 - rfaulk34 - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 04:44 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Loses points for being the holder on the Randy crampKick?
lol. You never know.
On that note...FR hit 40+ and 50 and missed the chippy at the end. His FG score... 44.6
RE: PFF wk 1 - Wyche'sWarrior - 09-14-2020
No rhyme or reason to the scores it seems....ah well, most are close to what I would've thought. Except I thought Pratt would be high 50s, low 60s, XSF lower, and Huber higher. Just seemed like I saw 57 around the ball a lot.
RE: PFF wk 1 - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 09-14-2020
The free grades are just overall at PFF. If you pay (which I do not), then you get much mire data (run bloxk vs pass block, etc).
I post PFF grades sometimes, but I do not think they are gospel. Just a data point. Quibble with their methodology (+2 to -2 for every snap).
Overall, I'd trust PFF more than the biased ramblings of fans on a website.
RE: PFF wk 1 - Nicomo Cosca - 09-14-2020
What did Jonah grade at?
RE: PFF wk 1 - WhodeyRay - 09-14-2020
There is no way in the name of zues' butthole that XSF played better than Price did. The guy finally had a really good game. Xfs looked lost and like a bad backup and giving him a 75 really makes me question pff. It seems like gymnastics scoring or some crap. Do they get deductions for degree of difficulty or something.
RE: PFF wk 1 - rfaulk34 - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 09:51 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: What did Jonah grade at?
63.5
RE: PFF wk 1 - MasonDT70 - 09-14-2020
Well at least the bates grade seems accurate. I thought he had a great game. I recall at least 2 pbus and and some good hits.
RE: PFF wk 1 - MasonDT70 - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 10:29 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: 63.5
Honestly that's not to bad for a 1st game agaisnt some good DEs in bosa and ingram.
RE: PFF wk 1 - Nicomo Cosca - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 10:55 PM)MasonDT70 Wrote: Honestly that's not to bad for a 1st game agaisnt some good DEs in bosa and ingram.
Yeah, I’ll take it. Step up from Ogbuehi and Price at least.
RE: PFF wk 1 - GreenCornBengal - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 04:41 PM)pally Wrote:The Bengals kept RBs in to block on 10 occasions on 45 dropbacks against the Chargers.
— Jake (@Jake_NFL) September 14, 2020
They kept TEs in to block on 5 occasions, and John Ross once.
PFF puts 6 pressures on Bobby Hart and 2 on Burrow's own creation. I noted that he may have run into pressure once or twice.
This is the main adjustment I’m shocked wasn’t made. Why weren’t the TEs kept in to block? Shameful.
RE: PFF wk 1 - bengaloo - 09-14-2020
PFF just lost some cred with me. Some of those grades make no sense.
RE: PFF wk 1 - rfaulk34 - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 10:26 PM)WhodeyRay Wrote: There is no way in the name of zues' butthole that XSF played better than Price did. The guy finally had a really good game. Xfs looked lost and like a bad backup and giving him a 75 really makes me question pff. It seems like gymnastics scoring or some crap. Do they get deductions for degree of difficulty or something.
I beg to differ. I went back again and focused on XFS. He earned that grade and definitely played stronger and better than Price.
RE: PFF wk 1 - rfaulk34 - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 10:55 PM)MasonDT70 Wrote: Honestly that's not to bad for a 1st game agaisnt some good DEs in bosa and ingram.
(09-14-2020, 10:56 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Yeah, I’ll take it. Step up from Ogbuehi and Price at least.
Seemingly, Hart appears to the the main reason "the line looked bad" yesterday.
RE: PFF wk 1 - BengalFanInNJ - 09-14-2020
Thanks for the info Faulk.
RE: PFF wk 1 - Nicomo Cosca - 09-15-2020
(09-14-2020, 11:43 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Seemingly, Hart appears to the the main reason "the line looked bad" yesterday.
Shocker.