![]() |
Receiver in first round? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE) +--- Thread: Receiver in first round? (/Thread-Receiver-in-first-round) |
RE: Receiver in first round? - rfaulk34 - 01-25-2021 (01-25-2021, 03:11 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Unsure of the criteria you used to man your teams, but here's what I did: 2010-2017 draft. Took the top 5 of each draft for one team and #15-19 for the other team. RE: Receiver in first round? - SuperBowlBound! - 01-25-2021 (01-25-2021, 09:57 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: I just don;t see your scenario helping our team enough.. we need more picks not less, trade back fine but picking a TE than trying to trade back into 1st round to pick a WR and lose the advantage of the getting the extra pick does do it for me with the holes we have on this defense plus logic says we need to get three good lineman added to this team, 2 via FA and 1 via draft. so why not trade back take Pitts or Smith or Chase if there, then pick a DE and Oline with two high 2nd round picks, then come back with a speed WR in 3rd round. You have to stop teams scoring besides scoring points.. a balance team (offense/defense) gives you a better chance to win on a weekly basis. After watching the Bills defense get dismantled it made me think we should have the best offense that we can get. That is why I wanted to get a unique player like Kyle Pitts over an OL that I think we can get in Free Agency. If we wanted to go a different route we could possibly get Marvin Jones and a couple of above average FA - OG and OT. If we did that then I would be fine with your idea of trading down for more picks and drafting to help our defense. I guess you have to ask is it better to sign FA defensive players or offensive players. |