If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok

If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - Printable Version

+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok (/Thread-If-gio-hit-was-ok-then-brown-hit-was-ok)

Pages: 1 2

If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - StLucieBengal - 01-10-2016

No other solution.

Let's not even get into porter

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - reuben.ahmed - 01-10-2016

Nobody but Bengals fans will understand and agree that the refs played a part in this game.

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - wildcats forever - 01-10-2016

(01-10-2016, 03:18 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: No other solution.

Let's not even get into porter

I agree but think they should have stayed away from any possible penalties, especially given the way things were going.

I just don't know what the answer is anymore....

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - tlotharw - 01-10-2016

(01-10-2016, 03:18 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: No other solution.

Let's not even get into porter

They had an incomplete pass, but that was not enough for the mental midgets.

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - GreenCornBengal - 01-10-2016

Who Dey? Jeremy Hill Dey!

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - StLucieBengal - 01-10-2016

(01-10-2016, 03:27 AM)tlotharw Wrote: They had an incomplete pass, but that was not enough for the mental midgets.

Wrong. Bang bang hit on the play with the shoulder. Should have been a no call.

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - Johnny Cupcakes - 01-10-2016

The Bernard hit was not ok though...

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - J24 - 01-10-2016

Okay so what the f is a football move again. Eifert did the same thing Bernard did against Baltimore and they ruled it incomplete but with Bernard they ruled it complete?

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - treee - 01-10-2016

(01-10-2016, 03:38 AM)J24 Wrote: Okay so what the f is a football move again. Eifert did the same thing Bernard did against Baltimore and they ruled it incomplete but with Bernard they ruled it complete?

Doesnt matter that he was a runner it was still helmet to helmet outside the tackle box. i linked the rule change earlier in the thread.

edit*a different thread

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - Luvnit2 - 01-10-2016

(01-10-2016, 03:44 AM)treee Wrote: Doesnt matter that he was a runner it was still helmet to helmet outside the tackle box. i linked the rule change earlier in the thread.

edit*a different thread

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The Gio hot was definite not legal, the Burfict hit was legal, The Williams hit was legal. The refs screwed us at every turn on those calls

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - StLucieBengal - 01-10-2016

[Image: Tif63iW.jpg]

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - J24 - 01-10-2016

Those plays should be reviewable as well.

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - tjcase85 - 01-10-2016

(01-10-2016, 03:51 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: This pretty much sums it up. Pic on left, no call. Pic on right 15 yard PF
.. hmm

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - jj22 - 01-10-2016

Compare Williams hit to them, the hit on Eifert earlier in the game that didn't get flagged.

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - treee - 01-10-2016

(01-10-2016, 03:51 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote:

You forgot the last part: Unless its the Steelers. Same old same old from the No Integrity League.

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - Shake n Blake - 01-10-2016

(01-10-2016, 03:35 AM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: The Bernard hit was not ok though...

Yup. Neither hit was "ok". The hit on Bernard was far worse, but the Burfict hit wasn't legal. Dumb play by Tez to be anywhere near his helmet with the game on the line.

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - WildCat - 01-10-2016

you haven't been a bengal fan quite as long as i have.......

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - Aquapod770 - 01-10-2016

(01-10-2016, 03:54 AM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Yup. Neither hit was "ok". The hit on Bernard was far worse, but the Burfict hit wasn't legal. Dumb play by Tez to be anywhere near his helmet with the game on the line.

This is why the absolute witch hunt by the media is pissing me off. Yes Burficts hit was illegal and should have been flagged, but these "experts" are acting like it was the worst thing in the history of the league.

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - reuben.ahmed - 01-10-2016

The double wammy with the no call on Gio is it also resulted in a fumble. This game was ours.

RE: If gio hit was ok then brown hit was ok - BengirlVal - 01-10-2016

I'm still shaking my head this morning. It was such a lopsided game! If Burfict gets suspended the guy that took Gio out should get suspended too! The Coach who pulled Reggies hair should be suspended and Porter fined! These refs truly truly did a horrible job and I believe they should be fined as well. How come these refs aren't held accountable??????