(01-13-2016, 06:23 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: So, I get it was emotional, but Hill's reaction seems a little much.
https://twitter.com/insidetheNFL/status/687066295292919808

But I don't know, I probably would've been just as animated had I been in his shoes.

(01-13-2016, 06:36 PM)GMDino Wrote: Sounds like he was reacting to Burfict there rather than his own fumble.

(01-13-2016, 06:39 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: He's blaming himself, though. He said it on social media. He's reacting because he knows without his fumble, the Burfict thing never happens.

(01-12-2016, 06:51 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I'll again ask the question you dodged. 

(01-13-2016, 07:20 PM)Beaker Wrote: Youre mixing up dodging with correcting.

(01-13-2016, 07:39 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You state as you continue to dodge.  Joining the luvinit group of running away when you can't refute something?  No wonder you white knighted him in that thread, you're just like him.

(01-13-2016, 07:46 PM)Beaker Wrote: Repeatedly explaining something to someone who can't understand pictures is a waste of time. I answered, you didn't care for my answer. You call that dodging. Everyone else laughs at your failure to get it.

(01-13-2016, 06:39 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: He's blaming himself, though. He said it on social media. He's reacting because he knows without his fumble, the Burfict thing never happens.

(01-13-2016, 06:39 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: He's blaming himself, though. He said it on social media. He's reacting because he knows without his fumble, the Burfict thing never happens.

(01-13-2016, 08:11 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Actually, no, you didn't. 

(01-14-2016, 07:49 PM)Beaker Wrote: Actually, yes I did. Post 85 is a direct response to your question.

(01-14-2016, 08:02 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: In which you made a false statement that prompted my reply;

http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Un-freakin-believable-game?pid=159882#pid159882

which you have yet to respond to as it refutes your, "direct response".

(01-10-2016, 10:28 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Porter will def get fined.

(01-14-2016, 08:05 PM)Beaker Wrote: Which part of 2 steps and a turn don't you get? Is that not direct enough for you? You seem to be dodging my response.

(01-14-2016, 09:17 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: So four total steps, got it.  Thank you for admitting I was right.

(01-14-2016, 09:46 PM)Beaker Wrote: So I wasnt dodging. Thank you for admitting you were wrong.

And lol@ steeler math.

(01-14-2016, 09:55 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Dodging, obfuscating, whatever semantic argument you want to use.  You stated I was wrong when I said he took four steps and now you're admitting I was right.  I get that being wrong is painful for you, hence your long winded and roundabout way of admitting it.  But we finally got there.  Progress!

(01-14-2016, 09:57 PM)Beaker Wrote: Here, let me simplify. You're wrong. Gio took two steps, turned and got hit. He never took 4 steps and the video proved it. Just like you admitting I didnt dodge proved you were wrong....twice. Glad that's settled.

(01-14-2016, 09:57 PM)Beaker Wrote: Here, let me simplify. You're wrong. Gio took two steps, turned and got hit. He never took 4 steps and the video proved it. Just like you admitting I didnt dodge proved you were wrong....twice. Glad that's settled.

(01-14-2016, 11:30 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Oh, so now you're backtracking.  That being the case I'll ask the question again; how many times do Gio's feet leave the ground and subsequently touch the ground between his catching the ball and getting hit by Shazier?  I'll help you with the vid.