+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: Rival Talk (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Rival-Talk)
+--- Thread: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 (/Thread-Rule-14-Section-1-Article-3-Exception-1)
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - The Real Deal - 02-15-2016
(02-15-2016, 10:33 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: Joey Porter, that no good son of a *****
http://m.steelers.com/news/article-1/Porter-It-has-made-us-grow-closer-/c4a591b3-22b9-46dd-9e89-97160bd33920
Vontaze Burfict, that no good son of a *****
http://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/hamilton-county/cincinnati/cincinnati-bengal-vontaze-burflict-brings-christmas-cheer
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - The Real Deal - 02-15-2016
But get back to me when you find one like this
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - StrictlyBiz - 02-15-2016
(02-15-2016, 10:38 PM)The Real Deal Wrote: Vontaze Burfict, that no good son of a *****
http://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/hamilton-county/cincinnati/cincinnati-bengal-vontaze-burflict-brings-christmas-cheer
It's always good to remember that these guys are human too.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - StrictlyBiz - 02-15-2016
(02-15-2016, 11:00 PM)The Real Deal Wrote: But get back to me when you find one like this
He played for the Dolphins when he did that.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - The Real Deal - 02-15-2016
(02-15-2016, 11:06 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: He played for the Dolphins when he did that.
I want to hate you as much as I hate that girl in your avatar for crying like that on national tv...but this made me laugh out loud.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - StrictlyBiz - 02-15-2016
(02-15-2016, 11:00 PM)The Real Deal Wrote: But get back to me when you find one like this
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - StrictlyBiz - 02-15-2016
(02-15-2016, 11:08 PM)The Real Deal Wrote: I want to hate you as much as I hate that girl in your avatar for crying like that on national tv...but this made me laugh out loud.
Anyone ever find out who that girl is?
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - The Real Deal - 02-15-2016
(02-15-2016, 11:10 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: Anyone ever find out who that girl is?
No idea, but she should never be allowed back inside Paul brown stadium again. Talk about insult to injury knowing every teams fans were laughing at us even harder than they already were at the end of that game.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - The Real Deal - 02-15-2016
(02-15-2016, 11:09 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote:
No charges. Self defense baby.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - StrictlyBiz - 02-15-2016
(02-15-2016, 11:13 PM)The Real Deal Wrote: No idea, but she should never be allowed back inside Paul brown stadium again. Talk about insult to injury knowing every teams fans were laughing at us even harder than they already were at the end of that game.
Way too emotional over a game. I always thought Hines was a wussy for crying, but at least he had some skin in the game.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - BFritz21 - 02-16-2016
(02-15-2016, 08:38 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: What other actions could it have been?
(02-15-2016, 10:33 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: Joey Porter, that no good son of a *****
http://m.steelers.com/news/article-1/Porter-It-has-made-us-grow-closer-/c4a591b3-22b9-46dd-9e89-97160bd33920
Still waiting........
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 02-16-2016
(02-16-2016, 12:34 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: Still waiting........
For them to drop?
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - BFritz21 - 02-16-2016
(02-16-2016, 11:58 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: For them to drop?
Yep...... because all of you Steelers fans come on here and need yours to drop so you can man-up and post something with some value that's more than "it is so because we're the Steelers and we have 6 championships!"
Hell, your entire way of debating on the old board and even on this one was to just negative rep someone that posted anything truthful that was negative about the Steelers because you didn't have the balls to debate it or contradict anything that was posted!
I guess I'm wrong for expecting anything intelligent to come out of Steelers Nation, though.
My mistake!
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - 6andcounting - 02-16-2016
Can we get something that will keep official count every time a bengal fans mentions the steelers Super Bowls? And just for good measure, have it count when a steeler fan mentions it, even though it won't have anything to tally.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - StrictlyBiz - 02-16-2016
(02-16-2016, 12:34 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: Still waiting........
For what?
He was verbally jousting with everyone. I said it above. He shouldn't have been doing that. No one ever tried to say otherwise. That's a separate issue from being allowed on the field.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - BFritz21 - 02-17-2016
(02-16-2016, 04:08 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: For what?
He was verbally jousting with everyone. I said it above. He shouldn't have been doing that. No one ever tried to say otherwise. That's a separate issue from being allowed on the field.
I thought he was out there to "help" Brown?
Weren't you just saying that we don't know what was said? How do you know anything was fine worthy?
He was fined for, among other things, being on the field when he shouldn't have been.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - StrictlyBiz - 02-17-2016
(02-17-2016, 01:32 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: I thought he was out there to "help" Brown?
Weren't you just saying that we don't know what was said? How do you know anything was fine worthy?
He was fined for, among other things, being on the field when he shouldn't have been.
Whew, round and round like a dog chasing its tail.
Please show me a statement from the NFL and not a random blogger that his fine was for being on the field.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - JS-Steelerfan - 02-17-2016
(02-16-2016, 03:26 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Can we get something that will keep official count every time a bengal fans mentions the steelers Super Bowls? And just for good measure, have it count when a steeler fan mentions it, even though it won't have anything to tally.
I just did an advanced search for "six rings". I had it show me the results by post. The search got fourteen hits. Eight of the fourteen were in Jungle Noise, so we know who wrote those. Of the other six, only two were from Steeler fans (as far as I can tell): SCS and I were the only two to use the term, and in both cases we were responding to Bengal fans who brought it up first with the observation that they do it way more than we do.
Seriously, in the time this board has been active, there have literally been ZERO Steeler fans introducing the expression "six rings" in a thread, while Bengal fans have done it twelve times. Bengal fans are a living demonstration of the phenomenon that repeating a falsehood to yourself often enough eventually convinces you that it is true.
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - JS-Steelerfan - 02-17-2016
(02-16-2016, 03:15 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Yep...... because all of you Steelers fans come on here and need yours to drop so you can man-up and post something with some value that's more than "it is so because we're the Steelers and we have 6 championships!"
Hell, your entire way of debating on the old board and even on this one was to just negative rep someone that posted anything truthful that was negative about the Steelers because you didn't have the balls to debate it or contradict anything that was posted!
I guess I'm wrong for expecting anything intelligent to come out of Steelers Nation, though.
My mistake!
Dude, that just isn't based in reality. Search this forum for "six rings", "Six Lombardis", "six championships", or any other of the possible ways of expressing it, and you will find (as I have) that most of the occurrences of those types of phrases actually occur in Jungle Noise! And the rest are almost exclusively also from Bengal fans.
It's in your head so much that you have convinced yourselves that we post about it all the time, when the reality is: we don't!
Oh wait, I just realized that this sort of factual demonstration probably won't convince you.
I guess I'm wrong for expecting you to accept objective reality, when you'd rather live in your little fantasy world.
My mistake!
RE: Rule 14 Section 1 Article 3 Exception 1 - StrictlyBiz - 02-17-2016
(02-17-2016, 06:20 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: I just did an advanced search for "six rings". I had it show me the results by post. The search got fourteen hits. Eight of the fourteen were in Jungle Noise, so we know who wrote those. Of the other six, only two were from Steeler fans (as far as I can tell): SCS and I were the only two to use the term, and in both cases we were responding to Bengal fans who brought it up first with the observation that they do it way more than we do.Just to make it real simple for them....
Seriously, in the time this board has been active, there have literally been ZERO Steeler fans introducing the expression "six rings" in a thread, while Bengal fans have done it twelve times. Bengal fans are a living demonstration of the phenomenon that repeating a falsehood to yourself often enough eventually convinces you that it is true.
http://thebengalsboard.com/search.php?action=results&sid=203621eed92d1eec7f10f218dfe1e763&sortby=&order=desc