Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened (/Thread-Maine-Required-Childless-Adults-to-Work-to-Get-Food-Stamps-Here%E2%80%99s-What-Happened) Pages:
1
2
|
Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - GMDino - 02-10-2016 http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/08/maine-required-childless-adults-to-work-to-get-food-stamps-heres-what-happened/ Quote:One trillion dollars—that’s how much the government spent last year on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest welfare program. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - Nately120 - 02-10-2016 Your thread title sounds like clickbait. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - GMDino - 02-10-2016 (02-10-2016, 03:39 PM)Nately120 Wrote: Your thread title sounds like clickbait. As long as the title fits in the number of allowed characters I just copy and paste it from the original. But I agree because I thought that too when I first saw it. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - michaelsean - 02-10-2016 Wow in the northeast no less. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - GMDino - 02-10-2016 (02-10-2016, 04:05 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Wow in the northeast no less. Might be one of the few things he has done that made sense...and worked. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - Mike M (the other one) - 02-10-2016 I've always been a strong proponent of those getting aid that are capable should be doing something, whether it's something that prepares them for a job or community service work. Nice to see an example of it working well. It's also interesting they the D's are trying really hard to get this guy impeached. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - BmorePat87 - 02-10-2016 (02-10-2016, 04:05 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Wow in the northeast no less. Maine certainly is unique in the NE states. Sound policy and it looks like it is working. If you have no dependents and can work, you should. If they honestly would rather not work, go to training, or do 6 measly hours of service a week for money, they're not worth helping. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - StLucieBengal - 02-10-2016 I like this. Make these mofos work. . RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - GMDino - 02-10-2016 (02-10-2016, 05:09 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: I've always been a strong proponent of those getting aid that are capable should be doing something, whether it's something that prepares them for a job or community service work. He has other "issues" that the democrats don't like. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - fredtoast - 02-11-2016 I am betting a large majority of Democrats would support something like this. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - Mike M (the other one) - 02-11-2016 (02-11-2016, 06:12 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I am betting a large majority of Democrats would support something like this. Haha, ok ok. Democrats in his own state tried to stop this. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - bfine32 - 02-11-2016 (02-11-2016, 08:09 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Haha, ok ok. He meant the really awesome Democrats, not the regular ones. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - GMDino - 02-11-2016 (02-11-2016, 08:09 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Haha, ok ok. The problem is Democrats in office are no better than Republicans in off ice in that they want things done "their" way. I took Fred to me Democrat voters...sane people. The Gov up there has many, many issues that should be brought to light...but this was a good program. And it passed. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - StLucieBengal - 02-11-2016 (02-11-2016, 11:23 PM)GMDino Wrote: The problem is Democrats in office are no better than Republicans in off ice in that they want things done "their" way. I took Fred to me Democrat voters...sane people. If democrat voters are sane then why do they keep electing progressives..... Who go against these type of reforms? RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - GMDino - 02-11-2016 (02-11-2016, 11:46 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: If democrat voters are sane then why do they keep electing progressives..... Who go against these type of reforms? Probably because you call everyone who doesn't share your libertarian/conservative/anti-savage point of view "progressive". RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - StLucieBengal - 02-12-2016 (02-11-2016, 11:59 PM)GMDino Wrote: Probably because you call everyone who doesn't share your libertarian/conservative/anti-savage point of view "progressive". I didnt call Bernie sanders a progressive. Nor did I call Jim Webb one either. I base it off policy. I have also never called Ted Cruz, Mike Lee and Rand Paul a progressive. Rubio has crossed over into progressivism. RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - Benton - 02-12-2016 (02-11-2016, 11:46 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: If voters are sane then why do they keep electing progressives..... Who go against these type of reforms? RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - Vlad - 02-12-2016 (02-11-2016, 06:12 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I am betting a large majority of Democrats would support something like this. (02-11-2016, 08:09 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Haha, ok ok. Read the last paragraph.... Requiring work for able-bodied welfare recipients was a key element of President Ronald Reagan’s welfare philosophy. It was the foundation of the successful welfare reform in the 1990s. But the idea of work in welfare has fallen by the wayside. It is time to reanimate the principle. Ya wanna guess who stopped it then? Forcing people to work was "oppressive"...haha, there's that word again. Historic Opposition to Workfare President Obama has created a firestorm by overturning the work requirements in the welfare reform law, but this is just the latest step in a long history of liberal opposition to work requirements in welfare. For example, welfare reform under President Richard Nixon was blocked by left-wing opposition to work requirements. Throughout the 1980s, liberals in Congress blocked President Ronald Reagan’s efforts to require AFDC recipients to work. http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/09/obamas-end-run-on-welfare-reform-part-one-understanding-workfare RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - GMDino - 02-12-2016 (02-12-2016, 12:19 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: I didnt call Bernie sanders a progressive. Nor did I call Jim Webb one either. I base it off policy. (02-11-2016, 11:59 PM)GMDino Wrote: Probably because you call everyone who doesn't share your libertarian/conservative/anti-savage point of view "progressive". RE: Maine Required Childless Adults to Work to Get Food Stamps. Here’s What Happened - GMDino - 02-12-2016 (02-12-2016, 12:19 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: I didnt call Bernie sanders a progressive. Nor did I call Jim Webb one either. I base it off policy. These are the times you called someone a progressive or blamed progressives for something...anything...on just the first two pages of THIS sits's PNR section. Then I got bored and stopped quoting them. You have an obsession and a warped sense of relatity which combines to make everyone you disagree with, wait for it.... (05-16-2015, 05:10 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Fair enough... It's getting to be a more stark comparison. Which is what we need... Dems are going more socialism Plus the GOP is pulling more classic conservative. The progressives are getting easier to spot (05-18-2015, 09:11 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Large provisions of the bulk data collection go away June 1. Plus the court decision that it was unconstitutional. Yes it's a problem, and yes we can crawl out from under. (05-18-2015, 09:06 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: After reading this I looked at the Green Party issues and I see lots of progressive ideas there.... And if that's the case than a classic liberal would be oil to the progressive water. I just don't see classic liberalism displayed. (05-19-2015, 01:48 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Democrats ran away from classic liberalism 100 years ago. As far as the GOP goes they are having a classic conservative revival. Which ironically they are teaming up with classic liberals . (05-21-2015, 09:22 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Vaccines = not progressive (05-25-2015, 08:10 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Progressives vs the rest of us (05-25-2015, 08:20 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Yes it's unlikely any shenanigans will be at play. But you never know when that maniac gets in control. We already have a built in delivery system for a bio weapon. The flu shot. We have a history of rounding people up we think is a threat .... Blacks, Germans, japs.... Now the progressives in both parties are targeting the tea party. .... How soon until it's a group you think is important enough? (05-27-2015, 12:51 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: With them now wanting to play with the big boys they will have to spend quite a bit to get their forces up to snuff. Not to mention the land grabs they are taking in the south China sea. And building military bases on them. (06-01-2015, 03:26 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Walker and Rubio are hurting him badly. (06-01-2015, 06:06 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Not fair to say liberals. This is all progressives and socialists agenda. And to answer your question... No they actually think it's ok. (06-04-2015, 04:56 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: How will this bring back jobs? (06-04-2015, 05:30 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: And as far as Santorum.... He needs to Just stop it. Get substantive and either seperate himself from the other progressives Bush/Rubio/Christie/walker or get out. (06-04-2015, 11:21 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Add CNN too. (06-08-2015, 01:57 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Yeah lots of progressives in both parties.*Just wanted to cite a little racism in there too...because you believe nothing else mattered, in two national elections, except Obama was black. (06-09-2015, 11:03 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: In Richmonds link there were specific numbers on what the U.S. provided them.... I wanna say 57-60% of their steel/iron .... (Could be off a little, but I am in the ballpark of a reasonable discussion). Once FDR passed and used the export control act then followed up with an embargo.... That backed them into a corner. (06-09-2015, 11:09 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: The argument between bush and obama is funny because they have so many similar policies.... Just slight differences where they spend the money. But they both spend, both bailout, and both have been negligent. (06-10-2015, 02:01 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Never said anything about mass killings. Yes big difference between what FDR and what hitler did... But we still rounded up a specific group of people nationwide and trapped them in camps because they were themselves. Progressives have a history of this in america. (06-10-2015, 02:25 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Progressive foreign Policy vs Founders Foreign Policy. |