Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC (/Thread-Jill-Stein-s-Comments-on-FBI-s-decision-on-HRC) Pages:
1
2
|
Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Rotobeast - 07-07-2016 I'm liking Jill Stein, a little. http://www.jill2016.com/stein_prosecute_clinton_for_reckless_abuses_of_national_security Quote:Stein: Prosecute Clinton for Reckless Abuses of National Security RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - McC - 07-08-2016 Criminal, not criminal, the bottom line here is that she has proven beyond all doubt that she has no business ever being in the White House and a vote for her is nothing short of irresponsible. She is truly unfit to hold any public office. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Rotobeast - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 06:26 AM)McC Wrote: Criminal, not criminal, the bottom line here is that she has proven beyond all doubt that she has no business ever being in the White House and a vote for her is nothing short of irresponsible. She is truly unfit to hold any public office. I do not disagree. I just found this somewhat scathing, coming from the Green Party leader. TBH, I hadn't known much of Stein, until lately. She has little chance at garnering many votes, but I'd still vote for her before Hilldog. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - masterpanthera_t - 07-08-2016 While I'm absolutely disheartened that the major party candidate opposing Clinton at this point is Trump, this scandal if not the long line of others (even if the others may or may not be "witch hunts"), removes any doubt that Hillary is grossly incompetent for the position that she is running. Simply on the mishandling of classified emails, she should not be elected IMO. An average citizen will have been put under administrative restrictions given the situation, and have their clearances revoked. Simply following that line of thinking should remove Hillary's ability to hold a position which requires confidential national security related briefs. I cannot in good conscience even consider such an incompetent character for President. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Belsnickel - 07-08-2016 As good a place as any: Jill Stein offering her spot on Green Party ticket to Bernie. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/08/jill-stein-bernie-sanders-green-party?CMP=twt_gu RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Rotobeast - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 04:35 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: As good a place as any: Jill Stein offering her spot on Green Party ticket to Bernie. WOW !! RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - NATI BENGALS - 07-09-2016 And the only place i have ever heard Jill Steins name is on bengalsboard.com. From Rotobeast. I look at at least 3 national news media sites daily and 3 local news sources daily. Never heard of her. Havent been on social media really at all the last couple years. Does she have more support on social media? I saw a freaking infomercial for a fanny pack today. Yea a god damn fanny pack. Would it really be that hard to outbid the cost of what fanny pack people are spending to get a little recognition? I dont even know when i have to vote again. But the commercials for ohio politicians trying to get elected have been running for MONTHS!!!! RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Rotobeast - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 12:29 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: And the only place i have ever heard Jill Steins name is on bengalsboard.com. From Rotobeast. I look at at least 3 national news media sites daily and 3 local news sources daily. Never heard of her. Havent been on social media really at all the last couple years. Does she have more support on social media? Odd, isn't it ? I only heard of her, as a friend of mine works for Ralph Nader. I'm surprised she hadn't gotten more press. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Belsnickel - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 12:29 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: And the only place i have ever heard Jill Steins name is on bengalsboard.com. From Rotobeast. I look at at least 3 national news media sites daily and 3 local news sources daily. Never heard of her. Havent been on social media really at all the last couple years. Does she have more support on social media? (07-09-2016, 12:40 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: Odd, isn't it ? Unless you actively look for independent/third party types, there are some you won't find. As cheesy as it may seem one ofthe best things to do when there is an election coming up is see if there is anything on your state BOE site about candidates. If it is too early or if you can't find the information there, for bigger elections there is almost always a Wikipedia page for the election that will list all of the candidates. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - xxlt - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 12:40 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: Odd, isn't it ? There is a reason for this. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Rotobeast - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 10:43 AM)xxlt Wrote: There is a reason for this. Do people think she's a kook ? RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - xxlt - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 10:52 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: Do people think she's a kook ? Well, a lot do, because they drink the Kool Aid served up by the media. This is also why they think Trump is a viable candidate, and why he almost is. We will get called paranoid and other things, but some us see the media complex and the military industrial complex (first called out and named by President/General Eisenhower, who was, we should note a General, war hero, and a Republican hero before the party lost its way) for what they are. They are part of a vast and entrenched network that doesn't want Stein or anyone else who might redirect this off course and sinking ship of a country we have to see the light of day. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Rotobeast - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 11:03 AM)xxlt Wrote: Well, a lot do, because they drink the Kool Aid served up by the media. This is also why they think Trump is a viable candidate, and why he almost is. We will get called paranoid and other things, but some us see the media complex and the military industrial complex (first called out and named by President/General Eisenhower, who was, we should note a General, war hero, and a Republican hero before the party lost its way) for what they are. They are part of a vast and entrenched network that doesn't want Stein or anyone else who might redirect this off course and sinking ship of a country we have to see the light of day. Call me paranoid then. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Rotobeast - 07-09-2016 Update on the Sanders situation. http://www.jill2016.com/statement_clarifying_sanders_offer RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - Aquapod770 - 07-12-2016 Looks like Jill has a bigger set of balls than ol' Bernie. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - BmorePat87 - 07-12-2016 too bad being a doctor isn't experience enough to be President. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - bfine32 - 07-13-2016 (07-12-2016, 11:50 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: too bad being a doctor isn't experience enough to be President. What is the required experience? RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - BmorePat87 - 07-13-2016 (07-13-2016, 12:34 AM)bfine32 Wrote: What is the required experience? my own opinion: experience as a... -state executive -general -head of a federal executive department -federal legislator RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - bfine32 - 07-13-2016 (07-13-2016, 01:53 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: my own opinion: Welp Pat doesn't get to make the rules and it appears to be a good thing; as he is discriminatory. Luckily the forefathers did not agreewith your requirements. RE: Jill Stein's Comments on FBI's decision on HRC - BmorePat87 - 07-13-2016 (07-13-2016, 02:38 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Welp Pat doesn't get to make the rules and it appears to be a good thing; as he is discriminatory. Luckily the forefathers did not agreewith your requirements. Good thing I was just stating my own opinion. As a member of the electorate, I do help decide what experience is enough to be President. As a white male who does not own land, the forefathers wouldn't have wanted me voting (thought maybe my car would be the equivalent of owning a mule back then...). They were very discriminatory in that sense. They also wanted to make sure that they could have the final say in case the common voter elected someone without the right experience, so they established a system that took direct voting for the executive away from the people. But, hey, I don't want to take away from this opportunity for you to act like an asshat. I know you're still upset that I exposed your blog as being full of lies. |