Posts: 19,135
Threads: 622
Reputation:
81029
Joined: Oct 2016
Mood: None
To the people who think he is going to 'learn' from mistakes. He seems to just defend them and double-down:
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Posts: 3,682
Threads: 23
Reputation:
17253
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
This guy sucks.
Everything in this post is my fault.
Posts: 19,135
Threads: 622
Reputation:
81029
Joined: Oct 2016
Mood: None
The Bengals have lost 10-consecutive games versus AFC North opponents. Cincinnati hasn’t beaten the Browns since Nov. 26, 2017. The Bengals will see Cleveland again in Week 17 at Paul Brown Stadium.
Posts: 26,837
Threads: 329
Reputation:
217385
Joined: Aug 2016
Mood: None
What an absolute clown. We’re doomed.
Posts: 3,447
Threads: 33
Reputation:
17538
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 09:49 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: What an absolute clown. We’re doomed.
He said Andy checked into it. You could also argue he's covering for the QB by justifying him checking into it.
Posts: 19,135
Threads: 622
Reputation:
81029
Joined: Oct 2016
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 09:53 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: He said Andy checked into it. You could also argue he's covering for the QB by justifying him checking into it.
Zac said that was the right think to do several times. Then says We should have walked it in.
It's the play Zac wanted.
Posts: 6,201
Threads: 13
Reputation:
45971
Joined: May 2015
Location: Good Times
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 09:53 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: He said Andy checked into it. You could also argue he's covering for the QB by justifying him checking into it.
Why?
You could argue this... but why?
This is the same guy who yanked him for Thinley.
Posts: 12,778
Threads: 128
Reputation:
82609
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 09:59 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Zac said that was the right think to do several times. Then says We should have walked it in.
It's the play Zac wanted.
False it was the run option per defensive look. Honestly I get why Dalton checked to it considering he had no one to throw it too because the lack of WRs forced Boyd on the far hash outside and he had a light box.
I have the Heart of a Lion! I also have a massive fine and a lifetime ban from the Pittsburgh Zoo...
Posts: 3,097
Threads: 101
Reputation:
19983
Joined: Apr 2019
Mood: None
This is another shot at the o-line.
Only users lose drugs.
:-)-~~~
Posts: 3,447
Threads: 33
Reputation:
17538
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 10:01 PM)BengalsRocker Wrote: Why?
You could argue this... but why?
This is the same guy who yanked him for Thinley.
Because I like to be fair? Andy was 2 of 8 for 19ish yards, 2 3rd down sacks, and 2 yard run, he checked into, on 4th down in the redzone. I don't care who the play caller is, when your QB can't execute, it is not going to be pretty.
Posts: 482
Threads: 2
Reputation:
2340
Joined: May 2015
Mood:
(12-08-2019, 10:15 PM)Forever Spinning Vinyl Wrote: This is another shot at the o-line.
100% this.
If there are 5 men in the box, and there are 5 o-linemen, it indeed should be a complete walk in. It also means that the wideouts were covered, and we know they can't get separation in the RZ. I hated the outcome, but I do support the reasoning.
Posts: 1,340
Threads: 1
Reputation:
5599
Joined: Aug 2018
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 10:38 PM)wildcatnku24 Wrote: 100% this.
If there are 5 men in the box, and there are 5 o-linemen, it indeed should be a complete walk in. It also means that the wideouts were covered, and we know they can't get separation in the RZ. I hated the outcome, but I do support the reasoning.
Not with our OL and Dalton should have known that. The OL has lost the one on one battles all year , several years actually.
Fredtoast + Ignore = Forum bliss
Posts: 6,201
Threads: 13
Reputation:
45971
Joined: May 2015
Location: Good Times
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 10:38 PM)wildcatnku24 Wrote: 100% this.
If there are 5 men in the box, and there are 5 o-linemen, it indeed should be a complete walk in. It also means that the wideouts were covered, and we know they can't get separation in the RZ. I hated the outcome, but I do support the reasoning.
Reasoning is that our O-Line sucks monkey nuts.
Posts: 37,573
Threads: 890
Reputation:
123135
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 10:15 PM)Forever Spinning Vinyl Wrote: This is another shot at the o-line.
How the hell could it be a shot at our o-line? They blocked great today; especially in the run game.
Posts: 5,559
Threads: 82
Reputation:
25610
Joined: May 2015
Location: Florida
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 09:59 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Zac said that was the right think to do several times. Then says We should have walked it in.
It's the play Zac wanted.
Yeah, Dalton correctly recognized what the Browns were doing and checked into the play Taylor wanted. It failed.
No one was walking that in.
Bad preparation by the coaches. They correctly saw something in the Browns do, but their play design to defeat it was just plain bad.
Posts: 1,729
Threads: 23
Reputation:
2197
Joined: Aug 2015
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 10:15 PM)Forever Spinning Vinyl Wrote: This is another shot at the o-line.
I that was the not too thinly veiled point that I picked up on as well. O line didn’t get it blocked up. Whether that’s true or not I have no idea
Posts: 5,548
Threads: 199
Reputation:
25210
Joined: May 2015
Location: Boise, ID
Mood: None
Zac getting ready for when he has a healthy Cam Newton back there in 2020!
Posts: 3,097
Threads: 101
Reputation:
19983
Joined: Apr 2019
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 11:11 PM)bfine32 Wrote: How the hell could it be a shot at our o-line? They blocked great today; especially in the run game.
Yeah . . . except on that play. Which is what this thread is about. Just an FYI.
Only users lose drugs.
:-)-~~~
Posts: 889
Threads: 36
Reputation:
5042
Joined: May 2015
Location: California
Mood: None
(12-09-2019, 12:21 AM)Forever Spinning Vinyl Wrote: Yeah . . . except on that play. Which is what this thread is about. Just an FYI.
Exactly. It was a stupid play. With that said i'm glad it didn't work because i don't want them to win this season.
Posts: 19,135
Threads: 622
Reputation:
81029
Joined: Oct 2016
Mood: None
(12-08-2019, 11:25 PM)CincinnatiKid Wrote: I that was the not too thinly veiled point that I picked up on as well. O line didn’t get it blocked up. Whether that’s true or not I have no idea
The problem is 1st and goal from the 2...they passed and got sacked.
You power that in with Mixon who is having a near career day.
|