03-16-2021, 10:46 AM
(03-15-2021, 11:42 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Dill Wrote: You have still not agreed that majority rule is a Constitutional principle, and that the filibuster was no part of the Senate “as designed.”
Not only is this a false statement but it really shows that you tend to argue from a disingenuous position. I guess I can now understand why you never "see" Fred's antics, it's because you've been learning at his feet. In any case, I think we're done here.
LOL we were "done" when I documented the Founders' intent regarding majority rule.
You can't accept the point, because it gives Dems a legitimate reason to "change rules" to restore majority rule.
And you can't refute it. So comes the infamous "rinse and repeat":
When you can't show why a "false statement" is false,
you claim it's the other guy who has adopted the "disingenuous position," and can't say how,
but toss in a Fred-herring for good measure,
based on "antics" you've also never been able to specify, but--and here's the final irony--
attributed to a poster who understands very well the difference between supported and unsupported statements.