04-02-2021, 04:37 AM
Im not here to argue, I'm here just state my opinion as well as my observations.
As some said in that video their are many good olineman in this draft so that makes it easy to pass on sewell. I say that because I don't beleive sewell is a for sure talent (like they said in the video as well). I would be in favor of that pick if he was a "can't miss prospect". Now some here might think he is, but the fact that some don't shows he's not really can't miss. Even draft evaluators have him from #2-17 (or somewhere in the teens). So I can't go sewell at #5 with that uncertainty, unless this was a draft with not many good olineman.
Also, every team has bad draft picks can't be scared to draft even though OL didn't work out in previous late rounds, and this year Jim turner isn't having any input.
I love chase, feel he was the best WR in college 2 years ago easily. I'm not into combine stuff but I know he did good there. Although I'll be good with that pick, I'm higher on Tate than most so I don't feel its a huge need rd 1 (I really think his teamate Marshall will be close to as good).
Only reason I won't have a big problem with chase is the familiriarity with burrow
For me I'm on Pitts more as a "can't miss" prospect. Bengals or any team for that matter (excluding cheifs and niners) can use Pitts as an instant weapon and nightmare for defenses. He is basically unguardable and nobody in the AFC north I feel can cover him.
Wouldn't be mad at sewell but I have seen his tape as well and wasn't impressed, can he improve? Sure, but you don't take that at #5.
Again not trying to argue, if bengals take him fine, but just would rather have Pitts or chase before sewell. I'm also higher on Spain and the impact of pollack than most are as well. I feel we only need 1 G on the oline and depth, but I know others feel different but that's just me.
As some said in that video their are many good olineman in this draft so that makes it easy to pass on sewell. I say that because I don't beleive sewell is a for sure talent (like they said in the video as well). I would be in favor of that pick if he was a "can't miss prospect". Now some here might think he is, but the fact that some don't shows he's not really can't miss. Even draft evaluators have him from #2-17 (or somewhere in the teens). So I can't go sewell at #5 with that uncertainty, unless this was a draft with not many good olineman.
Also, every team has bad draft picks can't be scared to draft even though OL didn't work out in previous late rounds, and this year Jim turner isn't having any input.
I love chase, feel he was the best WR in college 2 years ago easily. I'm not into combine stuff but I know he did good there. Although I'll be good with that pick, I'm higher on Tate than most so I don't feel its a huge need rd 1 (I really think his teamate Marshall will be close to as good).
Only reason I won't have a big problem with chase is the familiriarity with burrow
For me I'm on Pitts more as a "can't miss" prospect. Bengals or any team for that matter (excluding cheifs and niners) can use Pitts as an instant weapon and nightmare for defenses. He is basically unguardable and nobody in the AFC north I feel can cover him.
Wouldn't be mad at sewell but I have seen his tape as well and wasn't impressed, can he improve? Sure, but you don't take that at #5.
Again not trying to argue, if bengals take him fine, but just would rather have Pitts or chase before sewell. I'm also higher on Spain and the impact of pollack than most are as well. I feel we only need 1 G on the oline and depth, but I know others feel different but that's just me.
