Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets)

[*ochocincos*]

(06-06-2021, 11:11 AM)Mobster Wrote: This is so simple minded. This is a reflection of how he was utilized on a team who used more 3 WR sets than anyone in the NFL and couldnt protect the passer so the TE had to stay close to the LOS, and not a reflection of what he is capable of. He showed he can make plays down field.

Sometimes the critical thinking ability on this board baffles me

I'm pretty sure someone who has a degree in Computer Science and who has programmed and tested for the past 13 years doesn't have a simple mind 

EDIT - And if the way they are using him is purely the reason he's such a low producer as a receiver, that's Taylor's fault. I just have a hard time believing he'd be some good producing receiving TE when he never really was in college (46 rec for 487 yards and 5 TDs across 31 games) nor in the NFL so far. Until he proves otherwise, I'm going to expect he's going to be just a good blocker and modest receiver at TE, and someone who I really didn't think should have been taken before Rd 4.
I've stated in the past that I haven't watched every single play of every single game, as I live out of state now and don't pay for Sunday Ticket (rip-off). If I don't have confidence the team is going to push for .500, I typically stop watching since I'd have to go to a bar and would spend $40+ each time I go. So there likely are snaps I didn't see. So if you have proof that I'm wrong, please provide to correct me. But you can't just make a generic statement that it's all because of the way he's used and also insult my intelligence. That's not going to make me believe you.