Question For Fred & Other Pro-Choice People

[BFritz21]

(09-10-2021, 02:55 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: Are you drunk? 

A “fetus” has those body parts, so, unless you’re saying that a woman has 20 fingers, 20 toes, etc, it’s not her body.

(09-10-2021, 03:23 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: Bels can probably help more with exactly what logical fallacy this argument (?) is, but I'll call it the "what the f*** are you even talking about?" fallacy.

Number of body parts has no bearing on the question at hand.

Read above. Unless she has 20 fingers, toes, etc, it’s not her body.

(09-10-2021, 03:31 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Because she has a right to her bodily autonomy. The unborn is not a person. They are not a citizen with rights. The pregnant woman is and the government cannot restrict the rights of a citizen without due process of the law.

But it’s not her body unless she has 20 fingers, toes, etc, it’s not her body.

(09-10-2021, 04:08 PM)Nately120 Wrote: If a fetus is a person we should see to it that pregnant women get paid double for any job they do while pregnant since their employer is technically employing two people...one of which isn't even born yet which is a clear violation of child labor laws.

Is the fetus doing the work?