11-13-2015, 12:40 PM
(11-13-2015, 11:25 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: This "Bad Andy" narrative is BS and you are allowing the media to warp your mind.
AD had a QB rating of over 100 his last outing on National TV.
All QB's have bad throws or bad games but I have never seen the media refer to Peyton Manning as bad Peyton and early in his career and lately they could have doe it. I don't see them trash Andrew Luck who as bee great at times, but a turnover machine early his career.
I get the media's stupidity and bias, don't get our fan using an old media narrative in 2015 with no accurate data to back it up.
Then you seriously must not watch much sports analysis. They have been all over Luck this year. I have even seen a number of "Peyton is done, he has no arm strength" conversations. Meanwhile, the "love" for Andy is massive.
Many of these Jeremy Hill conversations actually remind me of the Dalton conversations from the past. Some people just can't seem to admit that he is struggling... it has to be someone else's fault. The line doesn't block as well for him, they don't call the right plays, he isn't put in the right situations. It could be that he is simply struggling, or that he is not the second coming of Jim Brown.
I really don't get the argument that the offense should be changed to cater to him. I believe they are the second ranked offense? Dalton is having an MVP caliber year, the team is unbeaten. Why on earth would they change what they are doing? Yes, Hill is still going to get his carries. And yes, there are going to be times they need to run the ball more. Unfortunately for Hill, the other back has shown himself to be much more productive this year. Fortunately for Bengals' fans, it really doesn't matter who get the yards as long as someone does.
