11-24-2015, 04:39 PM
(11-24-2015, 04:22 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Not disproven at all. You posted a guy who added to more polls and redefined radical. You have to accept shapiro's definition of radical to disprove his use of the polls. If you redefine how radical is defined .... Ofc it won't jive. It's a lazy way to make it look like his numbers were false .
This is precisely why I said we should come to a consensus on what radical was on this board. But you and pat decided to be ridiculous instead so as usual .... A chance to come together on anything is derailed and made into a tit for tat insult fest.
If you read what I posted it showed (proved) that your source was the one redefining radical and extrapolating from the polls to created largely inflated numbers.
But, in all honesty, I don't expect you to admit the truth.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.