03-09-2022, 12:24 AM
(03-08-2022, 11:45 PM)casear2727 Wrote: "And your point is the WR3 had less production than WR1 and WR2 in Chase and Higgins? That’s a real news flash. I have a suspicion Wan’dale would have less production than those two, also."
Exactly my point, it isnt necessarily Boyds fault we have 2 superior receivers and he is underutilized as to his talent, it's his position, thus he is more valuable to us by providing a draft pick and his $10M than his 28 yds per game in the playoffs . (J24 credit on the stat)
Would you rather have had Boyd in the SB or a $10M RG and Trent Taylor in the slot?
Complaining about the WR3 has less catches, yards, or TDs than WR2 and WR1 is like complaining the punter throws less TDs than the QB. Of course he does. That’s the nature of the job.
Boyd plays 74% of offensive snaps. As I have already explained, the Bengals can have Boyd, a $10m RG, trade Bates for an extra draft pick (Jets and Lions have extra picks, cap space, and a need for a S, and might be a willing trade partner), and draft someone like Hill, Cine, or Brisker, and Taylor stays on the bench. And they don’t have to draft an Olineman high hoping he is ready, healthy, or what to position to play him at entering his second season like Carman.
