03-09-2022, 12:40 AM
(03-08-2022, 11:56 PM)casear2727 Wrote: Kinda the point. Teams that are annual contenders must prioritize positions cash-wise as to the best chance to win games and to elite players on their teams.
Standard Winning Offense: QB, WR1, Oline, WR 2. This is us and the Rams, KC has TE and Slot as their 2 primary receivers they pay. Rams nor KC pay their RBs.
Standard Winning Defense: DE, CB, DT (then LB, FS, SS). For us FS moves up to counter less than great CBs.
Regardless, the priority positions should receive the maximum cash to the best players possible:
Offense to throw the ball down the field, protect he QB, provide holes for RB.
For defense, stop the run, rush the passer, defend dangerous receivers.
Pretty simple.
That completely ignores schemes such as OLB being more valuable in 3-4 compared to 4-3. It treats IOL the same as OTs. You treat all CBs as equal without acknowledging the importance of your NCB like Mike Hilton since offenses are using more multiple WR sets, and if your FS is more important because of poor CB play then don’t pay Top 5 safety money to an inconsistent FS who isn’t elite and instead us that money to improve your CB core because of . . . prioritizing positions. Like CBs > FS.
You don’t even follow your own advice.
