03-09-2022, 01:44 AM
(03-09-2022, 01:29 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: I proposed using that money specifically on a RG which you’ve been whining about.
You’ve menstruated about how unimportant WR3 is, but inexplicably want to use a high draft pick to fill what you consider is an unimportant position flying in the face of all your logic banking on using that money somewhere else which you just complained about.
But seriously, my very first comment in this thread suggested signing an offensive lineman to protect the QB so he could throw it downfield. And I never argued against being able to rush the passer. Which I have reiterated at least three times for you if not more.
You’re making shit up just to argue.
You proposed using Bates money. I disagreed without a plan in place as it is MUCH easier to replace WR3 than FS with only one SS on the roster.
It doesnt matter the draft pick on WR3 it will be a rookie deal and NOT $10M are you not aware of rookie contracts? Again the priority positions is about cash allocation. Its ok to have a stud WR3 on a rookie contract, its great actually.
Its not your lack of reading comprehension or your general lack of knowledge that is the issue, you simply cannot allow yourself to discuss a topic without taking it personal and spouting things like "dropping the soap in prison" and "menstruated", its kinda sad. I hope Im not intimidating you into this defensive posture of feeble putdowns you continue to use to conceal your lack of faith in your own rebuttals?
