03-09-2022, 02:13 AM
(03-09-2022, 01:29 AM)casear2727 Wrote: Again you are kinda slow, my point was clear, if we are going to continue to have average safeties than FS becomes much more valuable.
That is basic football sense. Maybe this isnt your sport? A 12 year old understands: great corners/avg safety or avg corners/great safety
Keep trying though, you may get this football thingy yet...
(03-08-2022, 11:56 PM)casear2727 Wrote: Kinda the point. Teams that are annual contenders must prioritize positions cash-wise as to the best chance to win games and to elite players on their teams.
Standard Winning Offense: QB, WR1, Oline, WR 2. This is us and the Rams, KC has TE and Slot as their 2 primary receivers they pay. Rams nor KC pay their RBs.
Standard Winning Defense: DE, CB, DT (then LB, FS, SS). For us FS moves up to counter less than great CBs.
Regardless, the priority positions should receive the maximum cash to the best players possible:
Offense to throw the ball down the field, protect he QB, provide holes for RB.
For defense, stop the run, rush the passer, defend dangerous receivers.
Pretty simple.
“FS moves up to counter less than great CBs.”
Which position does the NFL prioritize according to you? CB.
So if you’re going to prioritize positions then you fix the less than great CBs.
Why? Because they are a priority over FS.
Great corners. Average safety. Get it? No, you don’t. At all.
