12-02-2015, 02:10 PM
(12-02-2015, 02:02 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I think it is nothing more than a feeble attempt at rhetoric.
If this or any other act was funded by a Christian organization or a Christian Organization called for the killing of innocents then I would give the title of the OP some merit; outside of that, it has no merit. I will say it is amusing to see some try to draw a correlation.
While he failed to cause casualties amongst the staff, the Army of God is who he has referred to as heroes of his and he has espoused their rhetoric according to some interviews with people who knew him. I'd say it is more credible than "a feeble attempt at rhetoric" to come to the conclusion that his motivation was religiously motivated in some part and that religion was something that those adherents claim falls within Christianity.
