Roe vs Wade vs SCOTUS legitimacy

[hollodero]

(05-11-2022, 12:06 PM)Arturo Bandini Wrote: That's the point of protesting since dialogue doesn't work. You don't get social rights by simply politely asking. 

Yeah, but to be fair, that is actually exactly his point, that this is what protests are trying to achieve.

And his additional point is that this kind of protest is illegal in front of a judge's house (or a witnesses house or a juror's house). Which imho makes sense in general, in general one would not want people trying to influence verdicts by directly influencing judges, witnesses, jurors and the like.

In the case of a SC justice, one might see that differently, since they are also quite political actors and hence a protest is more of a political protest. But overall, Sled's point still stands. The law as written probably forbids protesting in front of Alito's private home, and your assertion actually proves his point in that regard.