06-25-2022, 04:44 PM
(06-25-2022, 03:37 PM)Lucidus Wrote: Their logic and priorities are always seem to trend in the same direction; intentional moral depravity.
What a blinkered and nonsensical position.
Quote:Act: Children are murdered in school shootings.
Means: Use of firearms.
Conclusion: The right / freedom to access and utilize the means must be protected at all costs.
A disingenuous, at best, framing of the issue. Also a clear appeal to emotion instead of a logical or fact based argument. Yes, a person used a firearm to kill children. Would we outlaw knives if he used a bladed weapon to kill them? Regardless of the answer, your position does not address the actual issue, that being that the right to own a firearm is clearly enshrined in the Constitution, whether you like it or not. The acts of the unlawful do not invalidate the rights of the lawful. I rather think you already know this, hence your post making no fact based or logical argument to justify your position.
Quote:Act: Fetuses are terminated with an abortion.
Means: Consensual medical procedure.
Conclusion: The right / freedom to access and utilize the means must be denied at all costs.
Again, utterly disingenuous. Abortion is not a constitutional right, it is never mentioned, or even alluded to, in the Constitution. Your "conclusion" is also highly inaccurate, the recent ruling only returns the question to the states, a large number of which will not outlaw the procedure. If I was a more pro-life person I'd also point out that your argument here is also about murdering children, for which an argument can logically be made. But I won't make that point, as I'm not one of those people.