06-25-2022, 05:23 PM
(06-25-2022, 04:44 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: What a blinkered and nonsensical position.
A disingenuous, at best, framing of the issue. Also a clear appeal to emotion instead of a logical or fact based argument. Yes, a person used a firearm to kill children. Would we outlaw knives if he used a bladed weapon to kill them? Regardless of the answer, your position does not address the actual issue, that being that the right to own a firearm is clearly enshrined in the Constitution, whether you like it or not. The acts of the unlawful do not invalidate the rights of the lawful. I rather think you already know this, hence your post making no fact based or logical argument to justify your position.
Again, utterly disingenuous. Abortion is not a constitutional right, it is never mentioned, or even alluded to, in the Constitution. Your "conclusion" is also highly inaccurate, the recent ruling only returns the question to the states, a large number of which will not outlaw the procedure. If I was a more pro-life person I'd also point out that your argument here is also about murdering children, for which an argument can logically be made. But I won't make that point, as I'm not one of those people.
A great many people would lose their minds if their right to own firearms was revoked.
Yet, many of those same people have absolutely no issue revoking the reproductive rights of a female.
Those statements are both factual and evident as posited on a daily basis for those that advocate for them.
If you polled all Republicans and Evangelicals, and asked them which they would prefer if they could only chose one;
Have no requirements for gun ownership or allow abortions in case of rape and incest
What do you honestly think the results would look like?
I think you know very well what the results would look like, so please don't accuse me of being disingenuous or hyperbolic when the reality of where things are trending is rather disturbing, and make no mistake, the ultimate goal is Christian Nationalism.
