06-26-2022, 10:36 AM
(06-25-2022, 05:31 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Yes, losing a clearly delineated and expressly stated constitutional right is unacceptable. Interesting point for you to make, as the Dems have been doing their best to achieve exactly that for decades.
Oh, so you were engaging in intentional hyperbole? As stated earlier in this thread, there is no stated right to abortion in the Constitution. Never mentioned, not once. If your argument is that it falls under the 14th's right to privacy, then you'd have to agree that vaccine mandates are unconstitutional as well. Regardless, coaching abortion as protected by the 14th amendment was a poor conclusion, as exemplified by yesterday's decision.
The results would be immaterial to the argument you're making. One is a constitutional right, the other is not.
Oh, that's not why I labeled your argument disingenuous. I labeled it as such because it's based on a deliberately false foundation; that abortion and gun rights are both covered by the Constitution.
No what else isn't "clearly delineated" in the constitution?
Nine members on the SC
The filibuster
Qualified Immunity
One was made a right and then taken away. That's the bottom line.
The "right" only existed at the whim of the religious and political leanings of the people telling you it was a right whether the word "Abortion" was in the constitution or not.
That's why Thomas wants to "fix" the decisions about gay marriage, sodomy laws and birth control.
You have a gay brother, you said, so prepare yourself.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
