Roe Vs Wade Overturned

[GMDino]

Including some posts for context...wait for it.

(06-26-2022, 02:29 PM)Lucidus Wrote: Please explain your response without shifting the blame to something you saw and copied from Reddit. 

In the post you claimed was transphobic, the content addressed the realities of biological reproduction. At no point was gender mentioned. That's where you allowed your mind to go. It's telling that your first instinct was to pervert the topic in such a manner. 

I'm a homosexual and activist who's an avid supporter, defender and member of the LGBTQIAS2+ community. I have to deal with "veiled bigotry" by means of projection or misdirection all the time, so I'm sure you can understand why I find your explanation rather curious, to say the least.

(06-26-2022, 02:39 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I have a hard time understanding how you could be confused.  I've been told, numerous times, that men can get pregnant, have periods, etc.

You stated, in relation to men vs. women that;

One isn't required to undergo physical, hormonal and emotional changes to bring forth life.

One isn't required to endure pain, severe discomfort or various medical issues to bring forth life.

One isn't required to potentially be forced against their will and autonomy to bring forth life. 

This is denying that there are, indeed, men who have to go through all of that.  If you have an issue with my response to your transphobia then kindly take it up with the transgendered community, I am merely echoing their statements on this subject.  Maybe you're not the ally you thought you were?

(06-26-2022, 04:03 PM)Lucidus Wrote: I said nothing about men vs. women in the original post you responded to. You interpreted as such. I'm not responsible for your insertion of gender into a post about biological reproduction.


Again, you introduced gender into the conversation, when gender has nothing to do with biological reproduction.


Yet again, I spoke of biological reproduction and you chose to interpret that as gender related.


The only way to interpret "one" as "men" is to confuse biological reproduction with gender. "One" refers to anyone possessing the ability to become pregnant. They could be men or women. Again, it's not my issue that you chose to assign gender.

Perhaps this will help, by making extremely simple:

Group A contains all people that possess the biological means to become pregnant.
Group B contains all people that don't possess the biological means to become pregnant.
Groups A and B are comprised of both men and women, both cis and trans.
Group A is more directly [physically, mentally and emotionally] affected than Group B.

(06-26-2022, 04:21 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: And with this steamer of a post you've officially entered nonsensical bullshit territory.  I would think a person who states they pride themselves on making logic based arguments would simply own their error like an adult and move on instead of trying to worm their way out of it.  Thank you for the insight into your true personality.

(06-26-2022, 05:09 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Dude, your entire line of response in this discussion has been the internet equivalent of saying "nuh uh".  You are, once again projecting your own inadequacies unto others.  I'll leave it to anyone else reading to draw their own conclusions, and I do so with confidence that very few would fall four your particular line of prevarication.  

So anyway...

(06-27-2022, 12:09 AM)basballguy Wrote: Insulting someone because you lost an argument.  You’re cool.

Yeah but not who you think.  

Lucidus had his post "refuted" by inserting something he never said and being called a "transphobe".  He respectfully tried to figure out how SSF got that and then restated his point to clarify only to be insulted on a personal level.

That happens a good bit around here.