06-28-2022, 10:41 AM
The right to personal autonomy over one's body should not have to be spelled out in a country that claims its citizens are free. It is an inherent right . And is covered by the 9th amendment. The 10th does not supersede the 9th just because it is convenient. Gun rights are God given, according to those advocates. How in the hell can the decisions concerning ones' own body be otherwise?
What's next...Uncle Sam choosing your tattoo? piercings? maybe back to the days of forced sterilization of people deemed not qualified to be parents? We know they want to regulate how and with whom you have sex. Maybe they will go after timing and location. Every Saturday, the woman must submit to the man in the bedroom only in the missionary position. She is allowed to close her eyes and think of England during the act.
Every decision made by the Roberts court has been to place the individual above the need, wants, desires, or good of society...except this one. A woman's right is overridden by a fetus that cannot exist on its own. She becomes a broodmare with all the personal and financial implications that come with it. She exists solely for the purpose of breeding.
Abortion, BTW, was LEGAL in all 13 states at the time of ratification of the Constitution. It wasn't made illegal until the mid 19th century..thus it was not long standing policy at the time of Roe-v-Wade. Alito did a lot of cherry-picking to justify his personal RELIGIOUS beliefs based reversal
edit: newspaper opinion pieces do not qualify legal arguments
What's next...Uncle Sam choosing your tattoo? piercings? maybe back to the days of forced sterilization of people deemed not qualified to be parents? We know they want to regulate how and with whom you have sex. Maybe they will go after timing and location. Every Saturday, the woman must submit to the man in the bedroom only in the missionary position. She is allowed to close her eyes and think of England during the act.
Every decision made by the Roberts court has been to place the individual above the need, wants, desires, or good of society...except this one. A woman's right is overridden by a fetus that cannot exist on its own. She becomes a broodmare with all the personal and financial implications that come with it. She exists solely for the purpose of breeding.
Abortion, BTW, was LEGAL in all 13 states at the time of ratification of the Constitution. It wasn't made illegal until the mid 19th century..thus it was not long standing policy at the time of Roe-v-Wade. Alito did a lot of cherry-picking to justify his personal RELIGIOUS beliefs based reversal
edit: newspaper opinion pieces do not qualify legal arguments
Fueled by the pursuit of greatness.
