Roe Vs Wade Overturned

[*michaelsean*]

(06-29-2022, 09:02 AM)GMDino Wrote: It's not to be "clever"...it's the truth.  He may have posted about a new constitution, that's neither here nor there...the tweet I shared reflected what I was trying to say about what was int he constitution and who it was about which is one reason abortion wasn't mentioned.
I agree there should be a law.  But I bet your salary that the police unions fight it tooth and nail, then there are the lawsuits and then it goes to the SC and they reject the "law" because they already said what they said.
Like trying to codify Roe v Wade when the gop just filibusters.  
It's not as easy as "there oughta be a law" sometimes.
But we agree it should have been left alone by the SC.  Then everyone has that right and we go right along.  

here is absolutely nothing that the Supreme Court said that would stop Ohio or Pennsylvania or whatever state from enacting a law.  There would be nothing remotely unconstitutional about a state making a law that mirrors Miranda even if Miranda were actually overturned.