07-11-2022, 10:34 PM
(07-11-2022, 10:01 PM)GMDino Wrote: My bad...when I assumed you could read I shouldn't have assumed a) you'd read the entire article and b) you'd comprehend it.
From that second link:
"epic fail"
One, it contradicts itself because it's saying that "he entered the bathroom," even if the gender inclusive policy hadn't been in place, he would still be referred to as a she.
Even if the cross gender rule wasn't in place, it's still a male accessing the female bathroom because he thought it was ok.
That's also an incident at one school, so what about the other school?
Epic fail.
![[Image: 7LNf.gif]](https://i.gifer.com/7LNf.gif)
