12-09-2015, 02:11 PM
(12-09-2015, 02:05 PM)bfine32 Wrote: He doesn't live in Chicago.
He doesn't need to for my statement to be accurate. He may be able to legally own one at his current location at this present time, but the current legal precedent is that he does not have a "right" to own such a weapon and so therefore at some point in time his ownership of that weapon could become unlawful.
The lawful ownership status is what is dependent upon his location in this country, but wherever he is in this country he does not have a right to own said firearm.
