06-07-2015, 02:39 AM
(06-06-2015, 08:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: No. You didn't answer how Perry abused his powers to force the execution.
If you want to go as far as to suggest he is guilty of murder, at least expound on how he abused his powers to orchestrate it.
All the evidence prior to the execution pointed to guilt, the court found him guilty and sentenced him to death. He was executed, 5 years later it is found that the guy may not have been guilty; so there are those far left few pointing a finger at Perry.
Perhaps Perry could have issued a 30 day stay, but I see no evidence how he abused his powers to ensure the man was executed. lease explain.
He removed the head of a commission and replaced him with one of his own supporters.
A very long but excellent read on the case.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/09/07/trial-by-fire
More stuff.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/02/cameron-todd-willingham-execution-rick-perry_n_946654.html
The people that were responsible for killing Willingham have no problem with his execution because he was a 'bad guy' that liked heavy metal music and was known to beat his wife on occasion.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
