Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire

[Dill]

(04-13-2023, 07:46 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: as i said before, you grab a fact and make everyone speculate the rest and if they don't speculate the same as you, you argue it with them. When there's nothing really there worth arguing about.

It's not "speculation" that Thomas failed to report the gifts lavished upon him by a billionaire. And that he has violated ethical norms. 
That is the case whether we know exactly what these two whispered about on Crow's jet and yacht or not.

You are the one "speculating" here when you assume nothing untoward follows from the incredible access Crow's
wealth gives him to a Supreme Court Justice.

Would you think there was nothing to argue about if you found out that Art Rooney II provided expensive vacations for the head ref of the next Bengal Steeler game, and Rooney bought his mother's home, in which she still lives, etc.?

That would be ok if they had been "great friends" since 1996, when they guy began reffing NFL games, and no one could "prove" any wrongdoing, right?