Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire
#72
(04-14-2023, 08:35 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Amicus briefs are generally public. Their bias, though, isn't covered because given that cases before SCOTUS are never cut and dry (that's why they are there after all) the briefs submitted are always going to be biased to the side they are supporting. It is the nature of the situation. Bias is constantly present so reporting on it is pointless. We throw around the word as if bias is some big thing that magically makes an argument null and void but the truth is that bias is constantly at play in every aspect of these things.

Codes of ethics exist to prevent undue bias and to promote equitable actions by the state. But they can't eliminate all bias because of how engrained it is.

Bias exists but what we have here is a massive indication of CORRUPTION which is hardly the same thing
 

 Fueled by the pursuit of greatness.
 




Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire - pally - 04-14-2023, 05:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)