06-13-2023, 04:21 PM
(06-13-2023, 04:17 PM)Lucidus Wrote: If an individual - either accidentally or purposefully - shoots someone, should they be required by law to allow the person they shot to use their blood / organs to save or sustain their life? Should the right to life of the person who was shot supersede the bodily autonomy of the shooter?
I get what you're going for here, but this is a poor analogy. Your analogy would be more apt if the person who shot the other (the mother) was the person who got to make the medical decisions for the person who was shot. Who on Earth would be in favor of that?
