Roe Vs Wade Overturned

[Dill]

(08-20-2023, 02:11 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: First point, how can it be imposed nationally at the state level?  The underlined is non-sensical.  Again, if this truly does not represent the will of the people of that state then they will vote in people who do represent it at the next election.  

How amazing for them then that they live in a country that holds free elections.  They will be able to vote those people out and vote in people who reflect their positions.  Or they won't.  Either way the voice of the people will be heard, without any fear of the insidious "super-minority"!

Nationally OR at the state level. 

And sure, people may vote the scoundrels out of office if laws don't represent their will, or they may have other priorities which over ride the abortion. So NOT voting them out wouldn't mean they agree with all the laws they passed, or that in that instance minority views were imposed on the majority.

You asked for an example of minority views made law and imposed on a majority. 
Can you not acknowledge that you got that? Texas. Doesn't matter if they vote in people later
who do share their positions at some later date. 

So my original point was that it is not easy to ignore others beliefs about abortion when they are put into law. 
I cited Dobbs as a lead in to examples of minority beliefs put into laws the majority had to respect.

You have spun that into so many different directions and misconstructions, claims about constitutionality never made, misunderstanding
 "super-minority" control, etc. Looks to me like you just interject claims and assumptions I have not made and then demand I
"refute" your responses to them, or you claim I am ignoring "points." Soon I'll be "disingenuous" for not taking every misguided bait.