Roe Vs Wade Overturned

[Dill]

(08-24-2023, 05:16 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: It is as you chose to define it in the post I quoted. 

Indeed, yet you see the Senate as a place in which minority populations equal or exceed the power of higher population states.  This is an argument you specifically made.  Again, as I quoted above.

And again, it is the way you chose to define it.  Your issue is with your own definition, not with my reading what you actually wrote.

I do see the Senate as a place where a party representing fewer voters or the will of fewer voters can hijack the will of the majority, sure.

The filibuster enables super-minority control, and that control has been used to block the will of the majority.
That was not the "intent of the Framers" though it was the intent of those who instituted the filibuster. (We've gone over this before.) 

And in both Houses a minority party representing minority views can gain majority control--legally/constitutionally in the Senate and
illegally in the house, via gerrymandering. Same at the state level.

None of this makes the U.S. Senate "predicated" on minority control, as I have defined it.