12-09-2023, 05:45 PM
(12-09-2023, 12:41 PM)pally Wrote: 'She proved it enough that a JUDGE granted her the TRO.
It is the Texas laws that are malicious.
This woman, who wants this child, received devastating news about her unborn child. She talked with her doctors and listened to what they told her about the abnormality, and the risks to the child and herself if the pregnancy continued. She made the heartbreaking decision that the best choice for herself and her family was to terminate the pregnancy.
WHO IN THE HELL IS KEN PAXTON TO DECIDE OTHERWISE???!!!! He is not a doctor. He isn't the one risking death to carry this pregnancy. He isn't the one who could potentially leave 2 living children motherless. He isn't the one who has to bear the mental and financial burden of carrying a non-viable pregnancy
You people act like she woke up one morning and decided to have an abortion. It is heartless and cruel and frankly NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS
Ken Paxton also proved enough to a judge she didn’t provide sufficient evidence. There hasn’t been sufficient evidence the baby won’t survive and she hasn’t proved her health is at risk. One judge agrees, another doesn’t.
You are putting way too much emotion into this and quite frankly it’s insulting to say “it’s none of your business” simply because I don’t have the same biological sex. You don’t know my history or experiences with abortion.
Lastly, I said she should be granted the abortion so you’re getting worked up for no reason.
