12-09-2023, 06:31 PM
(12-09-2023, 05:45 PM)basballguy Wrote: Ken Paxton also proved enough to a judge she didn’t provide sufficient evidence. There hasn’t been sufficient evidence the baby won’t survive and she hasn’t proved her health is at risk. One judge agrees, another doesn’t.
Actually, that is not what happened. The Texas supreme court ruling states that it is staying Thursday's order "without regard to the merits" of the case. Essentially, the court has said that they don't want anything to happen until they make their ruling.
I am curious, though, what would be "sufficient evidence" for the risk to the fetus and the mother beyond the medical diagnostics and the typical course of the condition?
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
