Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Name a movie that should not have had a sequel
#43
(06-10-2015, 08:03 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: No, but they were still good movies that can hold their own. Kinda like the Jurassic Park franchise. The 2nd movie was still really good, and the 3rd one watchable, but neither could carry the torch of the original.

We're gonna have to disagree on this, JC. They just seemed labored and unfunny. Will agree they pailed next to the original.

Never watched the dinosaur movies. I know, I know, they're classics. Just seemed like kid stuff to me. Any time I discuss movies with anyone 30-35 they rave about those. And, I get it, it must have looked really cool to a 10 year old. Maybe I'll watch them someday. My kids give me all manner of crap for having missed them, so maybe I just need to buckle down and watch them. Good movies are where you find them and such.
“We're 2-7!  What the **** difference does it make?!” - Bruce Coslet
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Name a movie that should not have had a sequel - Awful Llama - 06-10-2015, 09:16 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)