Democrats losing all credibility in denial of overwhelming evidence..

[Dill]

(04-07-2024, 11:31 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I find a rather distinct difference between a logical, good faith discussion and rampant, banal pedantry.  

No, You really don't. Perhaps you don't know how to tell. 

For starters, reporting how you feel about arguments/people is not refutation. 

E.g., it cannot establish that two other people are part of a "gestalt hive mind."

People arguing in good faith don't substitute personal attack for argument.

and they don't term calls for supporting their own arguments with evidence "rampant, banal pedantry."

Once accusations and adjectives are subtracted from your "arguments"--racist, hive mind, anti-semite, banal--

there is really nothing left. And that's why you cannot reply to my argument. 

People who want to be challenged don't dodge challenges.