Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Name a movie that should not have had a sequel
#67
(06-10-2015, 08:03 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: No, but they were still good movies that can hold their own.  Kinda like the Jurassic Park franchise.  The 2nd movie was still really good, and the 3rd one watchable, but neither could carry the torch of the original.

I agree with this. I love Back to the Future and when I watch them, I watch the whole trilogy. Obviously the sequels aren't as good as the original, but very few sequels are better than the original.

However BTTF 2&3 are solid movies and the creators did a lot of work to make sure they followed the rules of time travel.
You can always trust an dishonest man to be dishonest. Honestly, it's the honest ones you have to look out for.
"Winning makes believers of us all"-Paul Brown
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Name a movie that should not have had a sequel - Bengal Dude - 06-11-2015, 04:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)