05-30-2024, 03:59 PM
(05-30-2024, 03:01 PM)GMDino Wrote: It was explained to you. They must all agree a crime was committed and it could have been committed in one of three ways.
You acknowledge that you don't know if its wrong or not but still imply the thing you don't know is wrong somehow. Heck, both sides agreed on the jury instructions but you still think the judge was somehow incorrect?
This is the point where I would suggest letting the people involved handle it as they know more than us.
If the judge made a mistake that will come out in the appeal if needed.
Edit to add: Mark Rubio is saying the exact same thing you did. If that isn't proof you're wrong I don't know what is!
This has been one of the biggest clown shows in a court room in a while and the judge is the lead clown
