Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Name a movie that should not have had a sequel
#80
(06-12-2015, 03:35 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Ghostbusters.

Ghostbusters didn't need a sequel, but Ghostbusters II was awesome. 

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Name a movie that should not have had a sequel - Bryan - 06-12-2015, 05:29 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)