06-13-2015, 12:36 PM
(06-13-2015, 07:37 AM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: You obviously don't understand the fundamental purpose of RFRA laws. The first amendment establishes our freedom of religion. In the case it conflicts with law the government has the burden of proof. They have the burden of showing a compelling interest otherwise their laws would trump and trample on the first amendment, which would render it meaningless.
We don't have to justify our religious beliefs. They have to justify why we shouldn't be able to act on them.
Exactly right.
Almost every religion is based an a crazy story with out a single shred of evidence to prove it is true. There is no way a Christian could prove to a court that there was a rational basis for his beliefs.
The burden is one the State.
