01-19-2016, 11:33 AM
(01-19-2016, 11:27 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: There are differences. However, the whole cleanliness and stopping the spread of disease isn't so much of an issue if you just engage in good personal hygiene.
Indeed, it is primarily a social and religious thing. Much like male circumcision started off as.
True that most don't remember, still a traumatic experience. Also, no long term health issues? Tell that to those where the knife slipped.
Indeed, and at a much higher rate.
Won't argue against that.
You know some very shallow women.
As to the OP in general, in the western, developed world there is no real justifiable reason for male circumcision beyond the social/religious aspect. Personally, if I ever have children and I have boys, I'm not going to have them circumcised. Instead, I will teach them to clean themselves and not be lazy about their hygiene. Just my two cents.
Shallow? Has nothing to do with being shallow.
Knife slipped? lol. You can throw in as many hypotheticals as you want to defend your foreskin. Cmon man.
There are no long term health issues resulting from male circumcision.
The idea of cleanliness came along with the religious and ritualistic aspects of male circumcision. It wasn't like it started out only as a religious thing.
