02-16-2016, 02:19 PM
(02-16-2016, 02:06 PM)Vlad Wrote: Freddy?
even as a drimnal defense attorney i disagree with some of Scalia's opinions.
For example taking a DNA sample from a criminal is no different than taking fingerprints. It is a valuable tool to protect us all from criminals. And there is not clear language in the Constitution that says we can not do it.
I also disagree with his opinion on putting a tracking device on a vehicle. Police (when they have a valid reason) are allowed to follow people where ever they go in their cars, so I don't see how a tracking device is any different. It does absolutely nothing to protect any right of the individual. Of course I think that the police need to have a warrant to do this. I am not sure if that was the issue in that case or not.