02-19-2016, 06:56 PM
(02-19-2016, 04:46 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Right, but there is no time limit.
But all this being said, I am in favor of the Senate making sure a person is qualified and doesn't have something in their past and then confirming then.
I agree 100% with this. What I don't agree with is the Senate saying they will not approve any of the President's appointments even if it is by far the best qualified person for the position.
(02-19-2016, 04:59 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Agreed. Seems some people only care about checks-and-balances when it's in their interest....otherwise OBSTRUCTION!!!!!
I agree with the Senate going through the vetting process to determine if a candidate is qualified. That is not obstruction. That is doing their job.