Legitimate Arguments Against the 2nd Amendment

[Sovereign Nation]

(02-23-2016, 01:06 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Because you claim that there was no problem with accidents involving drunk drivers JUST because you diod not see any.

Then I point out that accidents involving drunk drivers are a big problem even though I have never seen one in person.

Your argument was based on meaningless anecdotal evidence.  I was just pointing out how stupid and meaningless that is.  it proves nothing, and your opinion based on this is worthless.

I see where you are making your mistake.

I didn't not say that there was no problems with accidents involving drunk drivers.  Only that there wasn't an increase in these accidents.

That was the original premise of your argument, that the law prevents more of these accidents from happening. 

I contended that the law didn't prevent the accidents.  MichaelSean even proves my point, the law didn't stop him.  He knew it was wrong and still did it.  He only stopped when the law gave him a weak punishment of suspension.  I also think him aging had something to do with it as well.

It is an easy mistake to make, so don't beat yourself up to much over it.