02-28-2016, 09:08 PM
(02-28-2016, 07:45 PM)The BigPapaKain Wrote: You claim to theorize my motives then declare you know exactly what my motives are.
Yet again digging yourself in a hole of hypocrisy.
I don't presume you're all friends or a hive mind, but it's easier to say that then type out 'all the idiotic inbred helmet wearing window licking **** boy troglodyte Steelers fans' everytime I want to include you and those like you.
I do enjoy that you've attempted to say the same about me as I've been saying about you - that I've simply started a crusade because of a game. Again, you declare knowing my motives while attacking me for presuming I know yours - the very definition of a hypocrite. A very stupid hypocrite, no less.
You want to know what drives me - your responses. Your outing yourself as clearly getting upset; why else would you drop your sob story about your father and cousin (by the way - I've lost more than two people to cancer and many other tragedies; shall I sing you my weepy song too)?
Now come along and keep defending yourself. I laid out the ground work for you - just make my post your own. You've already done it once - it was a good dry run. Maybe this one will be more convincing, simpleton.
When did I declare I knew your motives exactly? I've only ever spoken in terms of opinion and suspicion ('it seems to me', etc.). Mine was not the language of certainty. By their very nature, the words I spoke left the door open for other possibilities. Yet, rather than trying to educate me on what those other possibilities might be, you instead continue to press your attack on my motives. I might be convinced that I'm wrong about you if you'd actually try, but your insistence on my hypocrisy and your vitriol against me (both of which seem* motivated by my being a Steeler fan), aren't very convincing. So far, you show no signs of understanding that a Steeler fan can be anything other than a lying, unevolved hypocrite. Maybe that's just because you're just trying to antagonize me for the fun of it, but if so, you've been pretty convincing role of the idiot who actually believes what he's spewing.
*Seem is not a term of certainty, but rather an indication of my current perception, which actually can be changed under the right circumstances. You seem to have trouble with this concept, thus this footnote.
