03-05-2016, 10:22 PM
(03-05-2016, 07:29 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: There are things that should be centralized (like one currency), but there should be limits and it should be relatively stable because the big things - things you need a strong central govt for - change very slowly if at all.
But, sure, you get gray areas when you leave social programs up to states, which might result in a state exporting it's poverty. Or you don't have uniform regulations, and then a state might be exporting its pollution.
I certainly agree that a smaller central is better in our unique nation, I just don't think the evidence suggests they wanted the kind of central government you have in a federation.