03-11-2016, 12:45 AM
(03-11-2016, 12:22 AM)Benton Wrote: Well, which is it? They didn't need a QB or they plugged in someone they thought was a starter?
Ok. I'll play the odds that include having a better chance to win this year than to win in a couple years. If we keep playing for next year, if we keep hoping a draft pick fixes it, we're Cleveland with better helmets.
Don't be Browns.
Be Bengals.
They benched Osweiler. For Peyton Manning. Who couldn't throw the ball. The QB of that team was irrelevant to their success is the point. It didn't matter. I was just emphasizing that Osweiler isn't a typical "backup"
You clearly are missing the point of my post. I'm done arguing it.
