Trump asked how he will make Mexico pay for his wall...

[Benton]

(03-11-2016, 12:11 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 1. Again he did not say he would go to war with Mexico over the wall; that's just some "fear mongering".  Of course we threaten war; you do know that is one of the perks of having the world's largest Military (tangent opportunity).

2. It appears only one of us watches Bill O'Reilly. I personally cannot stand the man.

3. You do realize if we cut aid to Mexico and we redirect that money to construct a wall, Mexico is in a sense paying for the wall. Lefties ask "How's he going to make Mexico pay for the wall?" and when a reasonable method is given that falls into the "that doesn't count' category.

Analogy makes little sense

4. They all were, you just disagreed with 3 of them.

1. So if he's threatening to go to war with Mexico ("Of course we threaten war; you do know that is one of the perks of having the world's largest Military (tangent opportunity).) then either a- he said he's willing to go to war, or b- he's willing to make empty threats of violence to our allies. Outstanding!

2. Good timing then. It was only a day or two ago he was talking about Brown Shirts, Hitler and Trump.

3. You do realize, in a sense, that you're making no sense.

You've got two problems here. First, that's not at all what Trump has said. What he said is: " “I will build a great wall — and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me —and I’ll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words.”

Make Mexico pay for it. Not the U.S.

And second, even if he meant what you say and not what he said, who is paying for the wall if we use money we give to Mexico? (Hint: rhymes with U.S. racksprayers)

So... short version... that's not at all what he said and your interpretation has the U.S. still paying for the wall.

4. Common sense disagreed with two of them. The other one appears to be a coincidence that you and he say the same things.